How are tenders scored under the Procurement Act 2023?
Since 24 February 2025, most UK public contracts are awarded under the Procurement Act 2023. Section 19 lets a buyer award to the most advantageous tender (MAT): the bid that meets its requirements and best satisfies the award criteria it published. MAT replaced the old MEAT (most economically advantageous tender) test, but the arithmetic evaluators use is almost identical. Criteria and weightings are set out up front, and every bid is scored against them.
A typical evaluation has three parts:
- Quality. Written answers on method, staffing, mobilisation and so on, each scored on a published scale and multiplied by the question's weighting.
- Price. Converted to marks with a formula, most often lowest price ÷ your price × marks available.
- Social value. For in-scope central government contracts, PPN 002 requires a minimum 10% weighting of the total score (or 10% of quality where an absolute method like price per quality point is used). Other buyers set their own.
Typical quality scoring scales
The scale is always in the tender pack. The most common are 0 to 4 (unacceptable, poor, satisfactory, good, excellent), 0 to 5 and 0 to 10. Each band has a description, and many buyers set a minimum score per question below which your bid is excluded. Pick your scale in step 3 and enter the score you realistically expect, not the one you hope for. Our bid answer grader can give you a second opinion on any single answer.
The two price formulas in this calculator
Relative to lowest: price score = lowest price ÷ your price × price weighting. Bid 10% above the lowest and you keep about 91% of the price marks. Percentage difference from lowest: you lose 1% of the price marks for every 1% you are above the lowest bid, so 10% dearer keeps 90%, and 100% dearer scores zero. The second method bites harder as the gap widens. Buyers may use others, such as scoring against the average price or a budget, so always check the formula.
Worked example
A council weights a contract 50% quality, 40% price and 10% social value. You bid £480,000 and score 70% on quality and 60% on social value. Rival A bids £440,000 with 60% quality and 60% social value.
| Bidder | Price | Quality | SV | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| You | 36.7 | 35.0 | 6.0 | 77.7 |
| Rival A | 40.0 | 30.0 | 6.0 | 76.0 |
Your price score is 440,000 ÷ 480,000 × 40 = 36.7. You are 9% dearer and still win by 1.7 points, because quality carries more weight. Drop one mark on a heavily weighted question and that lead can disappear. That is why the calculator shows your price headroom and the quality you need side by side.
How to use the result
If you lead, use the headroom figure to protect margin rather than underbid. If you trail, compare the price cut needed with the quality points needed. Quality marks come from specific, evidenced answers; see how to write a winning tender and our social value response guide. Looking for the next one to bid on? Browse live UK tenders across every sector, or see pricing.
Sources: Procurement Act 2023, section 19; PPN 002: Taking account of social value (GOV.UK). The calculator is a model; the buyer's published criteria always win.